<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone and iCard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/</link>
	<description>A weblog on Java Card, security, and other things personal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric VÃ©tillard</title>
		<link>http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric VÃ©tillard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/#comment-3064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Application downloads into the SIM remain (mostly) under control of the operator. This model is unchanged by the iPhone. Apple may have the opportunity, through their exclusivity deals with operators, to get some control on this content, but this is quite unlikely, since they don&#039;t control the SIM card.

In that particular case, the operator has all cards in hand: either they allow enough third-party content into the SIM card (as desired by the end user), or they miss the opportunity.

The most interesting thing remains to see whether or not the iPhone model is a success, and whether or not it is copied by enough manufacturers to make it significant. We&#039;ll see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Application downloads into the SIM remain (mostly) under control of the operator. This model is unchanged by the iPhone. Apple may have the opportunity, through their exclusivity deals with operators, to get some control on this content, but this is quite unlikely, since they don&#8217;t control the SIM card.</p>
<p>In that particular case, the operator has all cards in hand: either they allow enough third-party content into the SIM card (as desired by the end user), or they miss the opportunity.</p>
<p>The most interesting thing remains to see whether or not the iPhone model is a success, and whether or not it is copied by enough manufacturers to make it significant. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lexdabear</title>
		<link>http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lexdabear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/2007/07/12/iphone-and-icard/#comment-3063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, this is really an opportunity for Bandol. Now the business model for instance could be that some online webstore wants to dump a servlet into the SIM. But how to get the servlets onto the SIM? If midlets are not allowed and no API defined to access the SIM only the operator and Apple can load servlets onto the SIM. I see some contradiction between the iPhone&#039;s application model and the business model for Bandol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, this is really an opportunity for Bandol. Now the business model for instance could be that some online webstore wants to dump a servlet into the SIM. But how to get the servlets onto the SIM? If midlets are not allowed and no API defined to access the SIM only the operator and Apple can load servlets onto the SIM. I see some contradiction between the iPhone&#8217;s application model and the business model for Bandol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
