<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you want a side order with your SIM?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://javacard.vetilles.com/2009/03/26/do-you-want-a-side-order-with-your-sim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2009/03/26/do-you-want-a-side-order-with-your-sim/</link>
	<description>A weblog on Java Card, security, and other things personal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric VÃ©tillard</title>
		<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2009/03/26/do-you-want-a-side-order-with-your-sim/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric VÃ©tillard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/?p=255#comment-3546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a very good remark. I clearly focused on the &quot;classical&quot; GSM market, in which the SIM card is inserted in a handset. For the M2M market, there may be much more interest in having an extra feature.

In particular, the WiFi connection may be particularly interesting, especially in environments where GSM connectivity is not readily available, since WiFi may be cheaper to access. It also brings opportunities for the SIM card, outside of is traditional market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very good remark. I clearly focused on the &#8220;classical&#8221; GSM market, in which the SIM card is inserted in a handset. For the M2M market, there may be much more interest in having an extra feature.</p>
<p>In particular, the WiFi connection may be particularly interesting, especially in environments where GSM connectivity is not readily available, since WiFi may be cheaper to access. It also brings opportunities for the SIM card, outside of is traditional market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Vilarinho</title>
		<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2009/03/26/do-you-want-a-side-order-with-your-sim/#comment-3545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Vilarinho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/?p=255#comment-3545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you that the options of adding Wifi, Accelerometer and GPS would not be that interesting to be added to the sim. 

I dont think that a price of such high-end sim will be enough to motivate a low-end user to buy it and have a low-end mobile with cool sensor but poor UI, instead of buying already a high-end mobile device. The low-end users do not seem to spend that much even with services that are already on the sim (such as WIB or S@T browsing).

But those can be quite interesting in the M2M business, as the sensor or wireless communication channel is closely coupled with the SIM and, therefore, can assure the security of the data.

For the banking case, it seems to me much more of a lobby problem between companies. For the life-cycle, can&#039;t we consider adding a SIM application to the banking card? It would take as much time (or maybe a little bit more) to the bank. But concerning security it is much better then a few J2ME or other mobile banking apps, and in reality it is the same sim card providers that issues the cards for both banks and telcos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the options of adding Wifi, Accelerometer and GPS would not be that interesting to be added to the sim. </p>
<p>I dont think that a price of such high-end sim will be enough to motivate a low-end user to buy it and have a low-end mobile with cool sensor but poor UI, instead of buying already a high-end mobile device. The low-end users do not seem to spend that much even with services that are already on the sim (such as WIB or S@T browsing).</p>
<p>But those can be quite interesting in the M2M business, as the sensor or wireless communication channel is closely coupled with the SIM and, therefore, can assure the security of the data.</p>
<p>For the banking case, it seems to me much more of a lobby problem between companies. For the life-cycle, can&#8217;t we consider adding a SIM application to the banking card? It would take as much time (or maybe a little bit more) to the bank. But concerning security it is much better then a few J2ME or other mobile banking apps, and in reality it is the same sim card providers that issues the cards for both banks and telcos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
