<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No memory, no chocolate!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://javacard.vetilles.com/2012/01/19/no-memory-no-chocolate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2012/01/19/no-memory-no-chocolate/</link>
	<description>A weblog on Java Card, security, and other things personal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric VÃ©tillard</title>
		<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2012/01/19/no-memory-no-chocolate/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric VÃ©tillard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/?p=786#comment-4442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Josep,

I agree with you: large chips do exist, and they are not much used because of low demand. Here, I believe that the issue comes from the people who buy the embedded chip (device vendor, Google, whoever). The idea is to convince these buyers that, by adding a few cents to the eSE price, they can have a one dollar return.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josep,</p>
<p>I agree with you: large chips do exist, and they are not much used because of low demand. Here, I believe that the issue comes from the people who buy the embedded chip (device vendor, Google, whoever). The idea is to convince these buyers that, by adding a few cents to the eSE price, they can have a one dollar return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmones</title>
		<link>https://javacard.vetilles.com/2012/01/19/no-memory-no-chocolate/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javacard.vetilles.com/?p=786#comment-4441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Eric,

I&#039;m not sure about the memory argument.

I think smartcard manufacturers can provide easily smartcards with more memory. There are some residual products in the market with huge memory sizes (for a smartcard). I think they do not do so for 2 reasons:
1.- They have no real demand for it
2.- They want to have a portfolio high different prices and features (die size can&#039;t justify difference between lower-end and higher-end model prices, IMHO).

What do you think?

I&#039;m looking forward to more posts on TSM world.

Regards,

Josep]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Eric,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about the memory argument.</p>
<p>I think smartcard manufacturers can provide easily smartcards with more memory. There are some residual products in the market with huge memory sizes (for a smartcard). I think they do not do so for 2 reasons:<br />
1.- They have no real demand for it<br />
2.- They want to have a portfolio high different prices and features (die size can&#8217;t justify difference between lower-end and higher-end model prices, IMHO).</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to more posts on TSM world.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Josep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
